The Unix command line analogy is sharper than most AI takes I've read. Instead of treating conversational interfaces as something new, tying them back to CLI systems highlights how text-based interaction was always the most flexible input method. The "drive the AI to its knees" mentality is exactly right, testing limits reveals where the actual useful boundarys are, not where marketing says they should be.
The Unix command line analogy is sharper than most AI takes I've read. Instead of treating conversational interfaces as something new, tying them back to CLI systems highlights how text-based interaction was always the most flexible input method. The "drive the AI to its knees" mentality is exactly right, testing limits reveals where the actual useful boundarys are, not where marketing says they should be.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. Yes you got it right I am trying to work in an echo chamber.
Too much research and you get exhausted with all the differing opinions out there.
CLI: I guess that means voice conversation is ultimately where this is headed?